Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voulez-vous coucher avec God?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per easily found sources offered by  and nominator agreeing and himself changing his stance to "keep". When WP:NF is met and agreed to by the nominator himself, a lengthy AFD discussion is not required. WP:OUTCOMES and WP:SK. My appreciations to you both.  Schmidt,  Michael Q.

Voulez-vous coucher avec God?

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:NFILM. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No, it meets "other criteria of notability": "The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release," thanks to this this 2011 selection to the major European film festival International Film Festival Rotterdam. And we have this Village Voice review for a "rare screening of Voulez-vous coucher avec God? will take place on November 14 (2010) at the Anthology Film Archives, 32 2nd Ave. in Manhattan." Meets NFILM. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Case made, thanks, Shawn in Montreal. In fact, I wouldn't have submitted it if the refs that had been added to the article in July had carried to the bottom of the article so that I didn't overlook them. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, BTW the fact that I found the same two refs, for the Rotterdam fest and the Village Voice, was quite by accident. I agree, the embedded links bearing the auto-assigned number didn't seem like anything important, esp. as I didn't have the status bar on my browser enabled, at the time. Thanks to MarnetteD and Sam Sailor for fixing the refs, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.