Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voxel-Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Very clear consensus. I am a little puzzled why it was even nominated.  DGG ( talk ) 21:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Voxel-Man

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable software. Mythpage88 (talk) 08:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is stubby and subject is specialized, but it does seem notable. Per Visible Human Project, one of two commercial products developed to make use of the "detailed data set of cross-sectional photographs of the human body". Google Books search limited to 2005 or later shows 179 hits, mostly concerning surgical and advanced imaging techniques. 739 Google Scholar hits--I've added a ref to the Journal of the American Medical Association review of the subject. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 09:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient coverage evident from a Google Books search, as was indicated when it was de-prodded.--Michig (talk) 17:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google scholar turns up a lot of cites and a lot of them appear to be reliable, independent and secondary.  Looks to me like there are sources to satisfy WP:GNG.  Msnicki (talk) 18:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Msnicki. --Legis (talk - contribs) 09:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.