Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyage: Inspired by Jules Verne/1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep as per guidelines. Capitalistroadster 21:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Voyage: Inspired by Jules Verne
This article is bias and totalitarianistic. It makes wikipedia into a game guide. it looks cluttered, and should therefore be confidantly delete La Station D&#39;ice 13:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * STRONG DELETE as this article is absolute rubbish and bias and per nom. --Shaanxiquake 13:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Markthanakin 14:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note Only edit from this user. Nominator (La Station D&#39;ice) also is a brand new ID with no other edits, and Shaanxiquake has very few. Something going on here? Fan1967 14:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Some kind of bad faith nomination. "totalitarianistic"?  "cluttered"?  Just in case this is a serious nomination, I suggest the nominator read up on Deletion policy before nominating more articles. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per above. I'm also suspicious of the same grammar misuse by two voters. Fan1967 14:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per above. - seem a good article to me and I see no reason for it to be here. --Charlesknight 14:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Article could use some cleanup and formatting, but so can they all. Otherwise, seems to be a bad-faith nomination of a valid game article. -- Docether 14:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, sez I. This one has the stench of a bad-faith nomination all over it. -- Captain Disdain 15:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. I concur with the above. An eye needs to be kept...but in this case on the nominators not the article. Inter lingua  talk 16:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Looks like pretty much any other game article to me: could use more references and a cleanup, but certainly not deletion. Kickaha Ota 19:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.