Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep, very consensus reached by now. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as this episode, and the rest of the series, is in pre-production-little infomation will be available until around November time. This was the case with the last 2 seasonal Doctor Who specials. I say delete for now and un-delete closer to the time. Dalejenkins 18:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep – this episode has been confirmed, as has the name, and at least two cast members. Plenty of information available, and fully referenced. —  Xy 7  18:50, 06 July 2007
 * Keep. Can't really see the point of deleting for a short time only for it to be recreated later. Article is fine anyway, its not as if its just a single sentence of what have you. &mdash;Xezbeth 18:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep - Episode is already been confirmed, name confirmed cast being assembled why delete when in the next few months it'll be recreated, BBC have already put out press releases/news reports about this episode. SimonD 19:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as there is already sufficient well-sourced info in this stub to sustain an article until more data appears. At least two announcements have been made concerning it already; there may well be more between now and November. Even if there isn't, it already is providing properly sourced info to anyone who may be trying to sift such facts from the torrent of speculation, and as such it is serving a good and valuable purpose. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 19:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. It may be a future episode, but enough concrete data are already present through means of several reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Everything in the article is well-sourced. Meets no deletion criteria whatsoever. Bad-faith nomination. --Edokter (Talk) 19:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The episode and series are both established and properly sourced. Other articles on this general topic are well-developed, and the associated WikiProject has a proven track record with regards to filtering out speculation and fancruft. The episode has already garnered considerable public attention in Britain and beyond, and will only continue to do so as the airdate approaches. Deleting now, only to recreate in the near future, is pointless. --Ckatz chat spy  19:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. If all we knew was the title and nothing more I'd say ditch it but since we know it's going to feature the Titanic and we know Ms. Minogue is involved.  That's more than nothing so I say go for it staying around.--Anguirus111 20:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: Why bother to re-create? Alientraveller 21:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What they said Deleting an unreferenced stub is one thing, deleting a fully referenced one is quite another. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep well referenced. Agathoclea 21:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per all of the above. Gran2 21:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keepper all of the above. I agree that this seems to be a bad faith nomination. When was there a time limit put on future productions pages here at wikipedia. HP and the Deathly Hallows already has a film page and that is at leasttwo and a half years from hitting the screens. MarnetteD | Talk 22:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:V on that one.--JForget 22:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, info is referenced and episode title confirmed. GracieLizzie 23:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.