Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyager, a Journey through Time and Water


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Marco Mazzi. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 17:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Voyager, a Journey through Time and Water

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some indications of WP:NOTABILITY, but not enough for me to establish it. No Japanese or Italian articles. Has been tagged for notability for seven years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Part of the problem is linguistic, hopefully someone can help there. Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging those who have looked at its notability before (it has been nominated for speedy and prod): who tagged it for notability in the first place,  whonominated it for speedy deletion and then prodded,  who looked at the speedy nomination,  who rejected the prod. Boleyn (talk) 07:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't even find an IMDB entry. Is that the correct name? —Мандичка YO 😜 07:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Though some do, art installations films rarely make it to IMDB. Different audience and expectations.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to the artist article. The exhibition is mentioned there, and I've added the name of the film, but I don't think we really need a merger so to speak. It would overwhelm the artist article. The original source that supported the article is still visible via Wayback - the name is correct. But standalone notability seems really doubtful, and it's been hanging out in this shape long enough. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)




 * Redirect to and a slight expansion of its information at the Marco Mazzi artist's article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Marco Mazzi as per the comments above--not notable as an independent work but worth a little expansion in the artist article. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.