Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vroomtone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as an obvious hoax (CSD G3). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Vroomtone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article fails to establish that the term it discusses exists, let alone that it is notable. After I PRODed the article for this reason, the author erased my comments on the Talk page and then responded that he had updated the article to show that "vroomtones" exist, but it still doesn't and neither do his references. A Google search shows that the only use of the word is in a single reader comment on a blog page claiming their existence. I've restored my comments to the Talk page. Largo Plazo (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Outcome: the article was speedily deleted. &#8212;Largo Plazo (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete hoax Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd love to, if it is one, except I have no way to prove it! (If it were demonstrably a hoax, what would the CSD reason be, vandalism?) &#8212;Largo Plazo (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, blatant or obvious haox is vandalism, tagged Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.