Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vs Joy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 07:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Vs Joy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There still aren't any in-depth references for this person besides his own website / advocacy. The mentions in the paper are just passing / voting results, positional announcements in MPCC (political party branch). He's involved in the political parties and was president of its state student union branch when he was a student, but I don't see any WP:GNG sources on him to meet notability for politician. I've tried to push this back to draft but it keeps getting pushed into mainspace by the originating author. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet the requirements for politician.  DGG ( talk ) 15:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: is a redirect to, so it should probably be handled however this discussion decides to handle this title.  Retro  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 23:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I redirected it there when I pushed it back to draft, but the editor changed the name to Vs in order to put it into mainspace. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being a member of a political party's youth wing is not an WP:NPOL pass, but this article makes no other claim that this person is notable for any other reason and cites nowhere close to enough reliable source coverage to get him over WP:GNG: of the five footnotes here, one is an invalid WP:CIRCULAR reference to another Wikipedia article, two are primary sources that do not count as support for notability at all, and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a blurb that isn't about him, and the only source that is both reliable and about him in any non-trivial way is still just a short blurb. This is not enough. Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete sources found do not support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.