Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vsvp2109


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Vsvp2109

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot identify the subject of this article. I would normally CSD A3 it, but I wasn't sure whether it applies here. I then PRODded it, but the creator took the template down. I tried contacting them, but I had no answer for almost a week. The context is so unclear to me that it would be impossible for me even to Google something. Maybe someone with more knowledge on Chemistry could help us more, but right now, this page seems quite unencyclopedic and confusing. Not to mention, of course, the lack of sources or notability. Victão Lopes I hear you... 15:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, possibly as an A3 speedy. Even if this were formatted correctly (e.g. as in this older version), it would consist almost entirely of tables of numbers with no context. Basically, it looks like a pile of experimental data, not even having sufficient analysis to rise to the level of original research. It's certainly not useful as a contribution to the encyclopedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally unsuitable for Wikipedia. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. There is no need to relist. If an article cannot find support within one week then it is justifiable to delete it as in a prod. Xxanthippe (talk).
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, it appears to have maybe been a lab report, but it is still unsuitable for Wikipedia. Chris857 (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Whiskey Tango Foxtrot. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.