Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vueling Airlines Flight 9127


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:NOT. Pastor Theo (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Vueling Airlines Flight 9127

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another non-notable aircraft accident. Nobody was seriously injured, just eight minor injuries on the emergency slide. See WP:AIRCRASH - this doesn't meet any of the criteria given. Simple Bob (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a particularly notable incident. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Notability. -Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per guidelines at WP:AIRCRASH. Location (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and unlikelihood of any historical notability. I suppose it's offered as proof that there are some things that even the extremely inclusive guidelines of WP:AIRCRASH won't include, but those aren't worth comparing to a policy. Mandsford (talk) 00:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AIRCRASH and per WP:NOT. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 1:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge all relevant info into the Vueling Airlines article. Mjroots (talk) 06:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Good suggestion, I would support that. --Simple Bob (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support merge. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  19:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per Mjroots. Thryduulf (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I have placed all that needs to be said in Vueling Airlines, suggest that this article now be deleted. Ex nihil (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Those holding opinions about the current WP:AIRCRASH (and indeed anyone else interested) are invited to comment on the latest draft of it's replacement. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I've read the proposal and it's well thought out. The most important point is that information about those incidents that aren't much more than current news will at least be mentioned somewhere.  As an alternative to a !keep or !delete, it provides clear directions on where information can be mentioned (such as in a section about the airline, or a type of aircraft problem) as an alternative to a full article; and it results in fewer separate articles than the current WP:AIRCRASH essay envisions.  Whether you agree or disagree with Thryduulf's suggestions, they are worth looking at.  Mandsford (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete just a bad day at the office nothing really notable. MilborneOne (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.