Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vuffespijder

was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Um, what? A Dutch slang word, with no translation, which can't BE translated. Doesn't even belong on Wiktionary. RickK 21:14, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * oddly enough neither google nor nl.wikipedia.org seem to have heard of this "controversial" word. Delete.--Ianb 21:30, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm Dutch myself, and I've never heard of this "epitome of Dutchness". Delete Eugene van der Pijll 21:36, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Being "shrouded in mystery" is not the same as being notable. -- [[User:Bobdoe| Bob Doe ]] 21:37, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Joke, pretty nearly a speedy delete. Geogre 01:19, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: not a Dutch word, nonsense. Speedy candidate. {&#9398;&#8469;&#940;&#8475;&#8505;&#8500;&#628; } 11:49, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense, prank.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 16:53, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - the epitome of nonsense - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  18:55, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 04:17, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.