Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan (programing language)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to dBase. --Core desat 06:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Vulcan (programing language)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This language doesn't come close to meeting WP:N. Looks like it was up for Speedy Deletion before, but the article's creator deleted the tag himself. So, I feel this is probably the best course of action Jauerback 14:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Historically this was notable as the precursor of dBASE, which only achieved the success it did because it was programmable. —Ian Spackman 15:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to DBASE where it is alreayd mentioned with mostly the same content and source. --Tikiwont 15:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Tikiwont. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 16:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to DBASE. Article has no real content. -- Boricua  e  ddie  18:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Only because nobody has yet put in any real effort in expanding it from stub status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathmo (talk • contribs)


 * Keep, is the ancestor to dBase/FoxPro (which even though they have long gone out of favour are still one of the top twenty languages in the world). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathmo (talk • contribs)
 * Redirect to dBase, per the above three commenters who voted Redirect. The source referenced here has so little info on Vulcan that it would not allow the present article to be expanded beyond a tiny stub. Since Vulcan is notable only as a precursor to dBase, the dBase article is where the information should go. EdJohnston 23:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Tikiwont. - Cyborg Ninja 00:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.