Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan Ventures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Vulcan Ventures

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod - article fails to show notability of subject and has been created by users related to the book (author and illustrator). Alhough it is related to a charity and not personal gain it is promotional in nature. Also no secondary sources to establish notability of a book that had only been published in the last few weeks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources found to verify notability  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 01:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of sources indicate this is not a notable series. It's also an advert and a copyvio of so speedy may apply.  pablo hablo. 07:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable series. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 03:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * According to Google Books, there appears to be a notable company of this name, i.e. it should NOT be redlinked, but refocused and referenced to be about the business. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 03:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This is an British company the Google links refer to a different American company the contested article was originally a redirect to Vulcan Inc. which relates to the American company that uses the name Vulcan Ventures! MilborneOne (talk) 11:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.