Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vydubychi railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  11:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Vydubychi railway station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Vydubychi railway station

Railway station that does not satisfy general notability and so does not satisfy notability for geographic features, including artificial features that are infrastructure. The one reference states that the station exists, and that trains go through it. However, the guideline states that features related to infrastructure are notable based on general notability, and there is no independent significant coverage.

This article has been pushed back into draft space twice, by User:John B123 and User:Onel5969, and moved back to article space twice. Rather than move-warring, a deletion discussion is in order. If sources can be found within seven days that establish notability, then the station is notable; and if not, not. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:STATION (for railway stations) requires  received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Doesn't satisfy. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly does not meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 09:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per WP:OUTCOMES, there's a long standing consensus there's an inherent notability with rail stations. It's literally impossible for there not to be extensive government reports on such a project. There's even a government summary already in the article.  If it's notable enough for the Ministry of Infrastructure Vladyslav Krykliy to officially open the station, it's notable for WP. Oakshade (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This station seems to be part of a major transport hub, and there is coverage of the new developments on the station itself (I added a few into article). And there is also the WP:ATD of combining the metro and railway station articles into one, as I saw coverage of the metro station as well (merging the metro station to here to be clear) Jumpytoo Talk 04:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Outcomes is not policy and does not excuse articles that fail to meet GNG. As it stands, there are not enough reliable secondary sources independent of the subject to meet GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I stand by my comments about outcomes, but the article has now been improved sufficiently to meet GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - With corresponding text from the article in Ukrainian, this article meets the requirements for WP:GNG. Doc Dimaus 14:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to have sufficient referencing to meet WP:GNG. Also, deleting this article would make navigation using the adjacent stations templates less user friendly and I don't think that would benefit the encyclopedia. NemesisAT (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade and Jumpytoo. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 03:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per previous voters. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 05:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have generally held all railway stations to be notable. Very strong consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade and Jumpytoo.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.