Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Christopher Waddell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

W. Christopher Waddell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches provide no independent, significant biographical coverage in reliable sources, just quotations from the subject, passing mentions and name checks. The article is entirely reliant upon primary sources, which do not establish notability. North America1000 08:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  16:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources in article are not independent (Church News, Liahona, lds.org) or are trivial coverage of church announcements (Deseret News). Search finds the subject named or quoted briefly in routine coverage of ceremonial functions like handing over a donation check or opening a temple, or as a trivial mention in the context of covering a large event with many speakers and quotes. It's not significant coverage of this subject. While some LDS leaders are notable under WP:GNG, this one is not. Open to alternatives if significant coverage emerges. Bakazaka (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.