Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W.a.n.t.e.d.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

W.a.n.t.e.d.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent verifiable sources provided, so claims of notability cannot be evaluated. Name makes Googling for confirmation difficult, so can't find any corroborating cites from reliable sources. The Anome (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poorly writted, unreferenced and inconsistant work. Possibility for rewriting with better writing style.ANHL (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources to back up notability. I originally CSD'd this (but was declined). -- Naerii  02:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.