Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W0rd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Little consensus to transwiki - Wiktionary isn't Wikipedia's sewer outlet. Anyone who absolutely must transwiki and wants the content, leave me a message. --Sam Blanning(talk) 01:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

w0rd
Unsourced neologism. Was tagged with prod by myself, but tag was removed. Ashibaka tock 21:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary.  Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! - E@ 22:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. w00t and pwn have articles, and this is nearly as significant in internet culture. gets over 200,000 matches on Google... I know there isn't much information there, but this is just a stub. I can understand why it might get transwikied, definitely, but I feel that it passes the Pokémon test. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 23:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, it's not really a  great  candidate for Wikipedia. Keep or transwiki to Wiktionary. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 05:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not nearly as significant as w00t and pwn. And the pokemon test (aside from not being an official policy/guideline) is a terrible gauge of notability.   Wickethewok 00:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's refrence(s) right now is a single google search. It might belong in a Wiktionary, or a 1337 Dictionary, but on wiki right now?  I don't think so (and man, I hate the Pokémon test ) Darquis 01:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and Delete per Tijuana Brass. -- ReyBrujo 05:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * n00k. --phh (t/c) 19:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.