Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W3dtek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 14:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

W3dtek

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no significant coverage for this software company. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH, as it applies to products.  I looked through the various Google searches; there is nothing useful out there.  Msnicki (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found this and this which appear to be substantially the same article but according to the Google News search results the article are from Sep 1, 2007 and Mar 25 2011. The machine translation makes a complete hash of it so I can't really follow what the articles say.  However, even this if it turned out to be significant coverage and the source reliable (I'm dubious based on the copy-paste editting of the two articles), that still falls short of establishing notability, especially with only one game to their credit. -- Whpq (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:CORP. Supposedly notable for developing the game Wars in Lebanon, but even this game is red-linked. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.