Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W41 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to B41 nuclear bomb. In a sparse discussion after two relists, the arguments for combining the W41 and B41 nuclear bomb articles seem persuasive. MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Update: I originally listed B46 as the article to be merged. That was my error. Of course, I meant to say W41 which is the subject of this discussion. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

W41
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article and W46 are unique in that they provide a separate article for the weapon configured as a warhead (i.e. not as a bomb). Many US weapons were used as both bombs and warheads, but in every other case the bomb and warhead variants are consolidated into one page. Some examples include the B28 nuclear bomb, Mark 39 nuclear bomb and B61 nuclear bomb. Further, these two articles are for weapons that never entered production. Kylesenior (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 12:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep seem to be enough sources, even though offline, to support notability Rlink2 (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment why do you believe this page should defy convention and have a separate page for the warhead version of the weapon? This and W46 are unique in that regard.Kylesenior (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with B46 nuclear bomb. See no reason for a separate article.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.