Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAAA-LD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  05:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

WAAA-LD

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only non-FCC source currently in the article is the station's listing on RabbitEars.info (which shows three channels of nothing — note that the article asserts It is currently not known what programming the station broadcasts.). The only apparently-known affiliation was carriage of All News Channel that supposedly ended in 2004 (notwithstanding that ANC shut down in 2002). I can't imagine a station like this comes close to even approaching the GNG. (And that's not even getting into the potential of these obscure articles attracting less-than-accurate information… if you see any claims elsewhere that this is a Nexstar-owned CBS affiliate (which I only recently reverted out of the article), you're looking at either a mirror (not a valid source) or someone that probably got their info from Wikipedia.)  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  03:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Station is in Valparaiso carrying a CBS station from Indianapolis when WBBM-TV is nearby? Nope, not real, and this doesn't pass GNG; I don't even think this is an actively broadcasting station.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 15:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.