Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WADND


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

WADND

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization and/or website. The entire article is unsourced. The WADND website has one page, looks like it hasn't been updated in several years. Minimal useful information in google (this article is result #5). In 6 years, there have been about 20 edits to this article, almost all of them routine procedural updates. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. I found a couple brief mentions involving lawsuit against ICANN and VeriSign. Some press releases. A trade group for a nascent "industry". Looks like an attempt to put a legitimate face on domain squatting (though it's a fine line and often hard to prove - and not always the case). I would want to see solid sources considering the line of business - they will surely attract serious criticism if notable. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.