Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAGs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Snow. This is not going to go any other way. (non-admin closure) duffbeerforme (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

WAGs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article, with its very narrow specialized scope intended to only a particular audience, is less "encyclopedic" and more "lads 'avin' a giggle browsin' a slag mag, innit" fan blog-like, therefore non-notable. Merge with Tabloid journalism. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm not sure on what grounds I should be reviewing this AfD on, as the article seems to pass WP:GNG pretty clearly and the nomination doesn't appear to offer much more than a WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument. If I've missed something please let me know. SportingFlyer  talk  20:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per SportingFlyer. StAnselm (talk) 21:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per SportingFlyer. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  22:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep IDLI argument; the concept forms a genre of reality television in and of itself (and that section in this article honestly needs expansion). Some tabloidish topics deserve deletion, but the fact that we pay attention to the significant others of athletes definitely doesn't deserve deletion. Nom reasonings that denigrate those who are interested in a topic usually prejudice a keep for me universally also; be kinder in your noms.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - clearly covered by reliable sources in sufficient detail to be considered notable. GiantSnowman 08:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily passes GNG as a stand-alone topic (although it needs a fair bit of work). Nzd   (talk)  08:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - article has its issues for sure but it passes WP:GNG by a wide margin. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  12:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.