Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Article deleted as a nonsense, hoax article. Dreadstar †  20:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

WAH

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced neologism; no evidence this exists outside Wikipedia. Biruitorul (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep No longer a neologism but a foundation that exists in New York to promote education. Sure more sources would be good, but then look at subscription journals in education. Pharmboy (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It is also a bit of a soapbox. --Evb-wiki (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like an Amero-centric neologism. This can be recreated later when it catches on, or not at all. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 16:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:HOAX. No evidence the teacher exists, let alone that his concept has been blessed by the US Dept. of Education. --Dhartung | Talk 17:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. Lots of weasel words in there too. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 17:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:V. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP.V, as well as possible WP:HOAX. Mh29255 (talk) 07:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article seems well-sourced, based on educational journal's I've read. Page is neutral and significant although references would be useful. sv23 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article only sourced in journals, difficult to add 'real' sources to Wikipedia. Page reflects a real breakthrough in education which my curriculum in public schooling emphasizes. I can attest to its existance. ludichris00 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.