Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAsP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

WAsP

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No appropriate sources provided. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Technology,  and Computing. UtherSRG (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Industry standard software. Very clearly meets GNG etc etc etc &mdash;siro&chi;o 12:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added these refs to article and remove notability template &mdash;siro&chi;o 21:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Siroxo. Meets WP:GNG. 2001:861:3186:7680:39C4:CDBC:7327:2B21 (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. A Google Scholar search shows it is widely used and discussed. (for example, each of these articles focuses on using WAsP for specific projects:, , , ) &mdash;Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.