Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBBI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

WBBI

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable local radio station with no significant coverage so proposing redirect to iHeartMedia. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 13:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and New York. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 13:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Although our broadcast article guidelines have tightened a bit, they really haven't changed for known commercial FM radio stations owned by large-scale broadcasting companies like iHeart, and this is notable enough to be kept (though I'd like to see improvement in the article for sure). There is no result that ends with it just being redirected to the corporate article without any rhyme or reason.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per Nate.
 * I also want to mention that I mean, it's notable enough to be kept on Wikipedia without it being redirected (since I mean, it's owned by iHeartMedia) even though sources and just improvement in general are an necessary thing here. Also, just a note, it shouldn't be redirected to the corporate article for no reason, because chances are, in some of these cases, they often redirect it to the state list of radio stations. (In this case, it would be redirected to the list of Radio Stations in New York State.) mer764KCTV5 /  Cospaw the Wolfo  (He/Him | t • c) 03:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep There is some SIGCOV in Binghamton paper, e.g.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sammi; there does appear to be some significant coverage in regional papers. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.