Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBNM-LD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

WBNM-LD

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to find the requisite significant coverage for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. [] probably qualifies, but one source isn't enough. Let&#39;srun (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky. Let&#39;srun (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Here's #2. Those two sources alone help. It's understandable that coverage of this LPTV trails off into nothing. The fact that it was supposed to be a Star Television Network affiliate (as in your source) is a surprise. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 19:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Soft Keep. All the sources so far scream WP:ROUTINE, even including a local fight over an antenna (snooze), and I couldn't find anything else substantial, but I have a soft spot for almanac entries in the Wikipedia, and that's how I think of populated places as well as radio/TV stations of any size. They are what we may call naturally connecting subjects that provide information that everyday folks may be looking up. Per that and WP:NOTPAPER, I can't see that keeping it particularly harms an encyclopedia. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 07:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.