Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBON-LD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

WBON-LD

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Thoughts on additions made since nomination? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Desperately seeking participants..... (80s reference) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Seems the article has improved enough to justify keeping it in. --Danubeball (talk) 01:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete for lacking independent sourcing. Within the citations I see sourcing to the station itself, FCC registrations, and accessibility listings. As of this writing the two independent sources that mention the station just do so in passing: an obit piece for a former news anchor and one mentioning the sale of the station.  The article has been around in at least stub form since 2006 so this seems to have just flown under the radar not to have been nominated for AfD long ago. Blue Riband► 19:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. This diff demonstrates considerable progress on adding reliable sources to this article. I don't see that contributor making assertion here. I make my assertion, not on that contributor's behalf, but because of the several reliable sources quietly applied. BusterD (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: The London Sentinel-Echo article looks like multiple paragraphs of significant, independent coverage. The WMYT article isn't great as it mainly focuses on the founder, but it does delve into the station a bit. I'd say this is a relatively weak pass under WP:GNG and WP:HEY. Let&#39;srun (talk) 02:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.