Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBTB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merged  to Georgia Public Broadcasting. I see no reason to keep this AfD open. If an admin disagrees feel free to revert. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

WBTB
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-Notable. No significant coverage and FCC database show no licensing info for WBTB. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 23:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

*Merge and Redirect: into Georgia Public Broadcasting. Since that is the network that is going to simulcast, like K-LOVE stations, the information should be merged into the parent article and the WBTB page redirected to the parent article. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 04:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes it is licensed, at a very low power rating (97 watts), for future construction and operation. There is no evidence it will create any of the programming to be transmitted, as opposed to being a mere repeater. It appears to fail the de facto notability standard for broadcast stations.  Edison (talk) 02:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment @Edison When I clicked on the link to the FCC database for WBTB in the article's External links it comes up as call-sign not assigned which is why in my original reason I stated that the station does not have a license because I was under the belief and still am that it may at one time had an FCC license or construction permit but apparently not anymore and I agree with you that it does fail to meet the defacto notability for Wikipedia. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 04:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment If it once had a construction permit, but no longer has even that, then the article is all the more deletion-worthy. Edison (talk) 04:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merged: Better yet, I was BOLD and merged the "WBTB" article to Georgia Public Broadcasting. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 04:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.