Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCQ

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was BJAODN and DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 17:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

WCQ
Self-evident hoax. BJAODN material Grobertson 17:29, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as hoax, after optionally putting a copy on BJAODN. DES (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Brilliantly written, but without references cannot be kept. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:23, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.