Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDANZ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

WDANZ

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Organisation without a clear claim to notability, and with all sources being references to the organisation page or to mailing lists. There is a substantial but unsourced "Controversy" section. One independent source I found is Computerworld New Zealand.

I just deleted a "competition" section as being inadequately sourced. gadfium 21:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom Lets  drink  Tea  22:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Aside from the NZ Compterworld article already mentioned, I cannot find any coverage about this organisation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delte - unnotable, original research (besides the Computerworld article).  Math Cool  10  Sign here! 21:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - gadfium  03:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.