Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDID-LP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

WDID-LP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It never served as anything more than a rebroadcaster of the Trinity Broadcasting Network, then it was sold to a group that couldn't find programming for the station, so it closed down. Even as someone who writes TV station articles, I can't say this meets the WP:GNG. Raymie (t • c) 20:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 20:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete There was a false attempt three years ago to allege this analog-only station could carry subchannels, but nobody ever found a source to dissuade my conclusion this station served only as a TBN repeater and didn't survive past that point. It technically meets WP:BROADCAST in the callsign change...but nothing else. A weak redirect to Template:Savannah TV might work to show it is defunct and retain its categories.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Though this analog license is defunct, it is survived on a separate license/facility ID by WDID-LD, originally granted as a digital companion channel in 2013 and is presently licensed… but currently only carries the Three Angels Broadcasting Network and infomercials. (Indeed, WDID-LD redirects to 3ABN's article, not the one for its analog predecessor.) Maybe there's some potential redirect target somewhere, but I'm not sure what, and in any event I don't think WDID in any form has served as anything but a repeater of larger services, much less attracted sufficient notice in any form, verifiable or no — there's no way in hell it gets over any of our notability humps, broadcast or general. -- WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  04:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.