Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WFL All-Time Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 06:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

WFL All-Time Team

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Arbitrary list & original research (violates WP:NOR) mhking (talk) 01:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * There are references included in the article, teo of them. the stats, team, et.c are refernced . . . McDanny74 (talk) 01:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Slightly arbitary list, but there are references. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 03:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Seen worse. Could be inproved. Keep.Bigmaninthebox (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I simply repeat . . . there are references and I agree it could be better, but it is new, it just needs some time and more editors. I think that it was too quickly added to the "speedily delete" and it seems there is a small majority if favor of keeping, although the sample is small.McDanny74 (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I concur with Lord Cornwallis weak keep.Bigmaninthebox (talk) 04:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I vote to allow it to stay. It is kind of interesting and as has been mentionm, it is sourced.NEPatriotsfan2008 (talk) 22:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's fine. Fins Big Man (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * One more for Weak keepRussFrancisTE81 (talk) 01:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.