Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WGBS-LD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. No other editors agree with the Delete analysis of the sources, that they are MILL covererage. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

WGBS-LD

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Virginia. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There is some sourcing which I have added, all from the 1994–98 period. They were on local cable and got coverage from that. Once Cox dropped them, they really drop off in local coverage. I could go either way. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, The new sources seem to be enough to say that it at the very least was notable enough in it’s early history to justify keeping it, but due to it being from a very specific point, I’m have to keep it at semi-weak. Danubeball (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * After thinking about it, I decided to say that this station probably does have the coverage to continue being on Wikipedia. Danubeball (talk) 01:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: The coverage from the 1990s added by Sammi meets the WP:GNG. Let&#39;srun (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG, nothing in the article or found in BEFORE shows anything meeting WP:SIRS. BEFORE found promo, ads, listings, nothing meeting WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth.
 * Source eval:


 * Weak keep. I understand that the article may well never grow much beyond where it is now, but I do think that sources 3-5 are sufficient squeak by on significant coverage, which I think was the only issue here. I disagree that these are promo/ad pieces; they read as normal coverage of a regional station to me. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  02:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.