Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. While it may have copyright issues, those are not settled here, where the consensus is clearly keep. Turnstep 13:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management
pure advertisement text (reads like a brochure MaxE 14:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

"The personal, almost family-like atmosphere at the School is characterised by the fascination and commitment of everyone involved." this is not wiki MaxE 14:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete || we,we,we,...
 * Keep its a real educational facility, judging from the number of Ghits. Have stripped it down to a bare stub. Jcuk 16:50, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth, the subject is verifiable. Bahn Mi 17:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 19:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as copyvio, see . School may deserve an article but this is not it. Accurizer 20:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This is a highly notable business school, ranked at the top of the list in Germany.  This nom is akin to filing a AfD on the Harvard Business School.   Two minutes of research, folks.  RGTraynor 20:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I take exception to the above comment. I performed research before voting; this article is a copy and paste from a copyrighted website. I provided the link for others to follow. Accurizer 20:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Which is grounds for cleanup, not for deletion. Worst comes to worst, a copyvio tag should have been placed.  RGTraynor 21:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep obvious. Sorry, nominator. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per reasons above. PJM 21:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I've tagged it as a copyvio and blanked the article, but the subject is obviously worthy of an article. Just not a copyright-violating one. Keep any new version. — Cuivi é  nen  , Tuesday, 25 April 2006 @ 21:48 UTC 
 * Keep and cleanup the cut&paste from the school. Restore the info box and just leave a stub.  School is certainly notable.  Kuru   talk  21:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.