Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WNYW-TV News Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Malla nox  15:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

WNYW-TV News Team

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Once again, Fancruft. This information was originally in, and should be kept within, the main WNYW article, and is not notable enough for a stand-alone page. Same criteria as WNBC news team, WCBS-TV News Team, and WABC-TV News Team. Rollosmokes 20:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The main article is already long enough; a split is appropriate.  Also, the cruft essay is not policy or even a guideline.  Please stop referencing it in deletion discussions.  --Nricardo 21:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is only 22K even with this information (which probably struggles to pass WP:NOT) in it.  Eliminator JR Talk  22:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above.--Svetovid 22:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * suggest Move to List of WNYW news staff, etc, because many of these people already have articles and a list of the people who have worked for a program is useful for navigating among them. Alternately, if you've merged it already (which it looks like) you can just redirect it. There's no need to involve AFD. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 23:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and the others also. Its a very good navigation aid. They are essentially lists, and make the main article more readable by being broken out. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete can't this do better as a category? and it is rather... pointless to have. Whsitchy 02:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to List of WNYW-TV personalities and keep. Being on the Fox affiliate in the #1 TV market makes most of them notable, and the list is to large to be merged back into WNYW-TV. DHowell 01:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Moving to another article defeats the purpose of this AfD. The information is not too large to be merged back into the main article, and can be pared down considerably.   Rollosmokes 02:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.