Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WSA Winnipeg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 05:00, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

WSA Winnipeg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Cloudz 679 19:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz 679 17:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Cloudz 679  19:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - WP:FOOTYN is an essay, not an accepted policy or guideline for one; secondly there seems to be significant enough coverage of this team on Google News. -CrazyHos12 (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The team has had some coverage, and the consensus appears to be that PDL teams are considered notable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - PDL teams are considered notable, as per every other team that has played in the league. JonBroxton (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - plays at a notable level, needs improving not deleting. GiantSnowman 10:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Teams that have participated in the USL Premier Development League (level four) appear to be considered notable. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.