Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUCU-LD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

WUCU-LD

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It seems hard to imagine that a now-defunct one-year low-power television station that only carried national programming, owned by a company that owns many such stations, could come anywhere close to meeting the GNG. This was previously part of a bulk nomination of many Innovate Corp./HC2-associated TV stations' articles earlier this year, which failed largely because it was too bulky (and intermingled stations much like this one with co-owned stations that nonetheless have longer and/or more-verifiable histories); the articles nominated in it were exempted from any standard post-close waiting periods.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  19:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Articles like this one are why I tried to send 140 at once to AfD. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Sources in the article don't appear to help with notability nor could I find any, so looks like GNG is not met. Rupples (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.