Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Divas Do New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 12:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

WWE Divas Do New York
Recreated article about a direct to video DVD. This non-notable release lacks adequate sources to allow for a neutral and verifiable article. Jester 17:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously pointless and devoid of any useful information. --Crossmr 17:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable about it. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. If other direct-to-video releases have articles, including other WWE releases, then precedent exists for this one to be kept as well. 23skidoo 19:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Please don't use WP:POKEMON. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, and the precedent is made now, unless you can show us a previous AfD of a similar article were the result was keep. -- E ivindt@c 22:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if any before got created, they should be deleted. Thank God for WP:NBD - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge all of these DVDs/videos into one article. -Sean Curtin 03:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep same reason as 23skidoo --sonicKAI 12:20, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia . Until and unless there is sustained study and reporting on the subject "WWE Divas Do New York", published in reliable, reputable works, we may not write an encyclopedia article on it. Wikipedia is not a space where anyone may leave jottings on any subject, however trivial, however utterly unresearched, without due consideration of the article space policies. If reliable sources focused on the subject "WWE Divas Do New York"—books, monographs, theses, journal articles, even a thoughtful analysis in the pages of, say, The New York Times—are located, I will be glad to consider the matter anew. Regards — Encephalon 10:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.