Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W D Moore & Co Warehouse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no remaining arguments for deletion. WP:SK. j⚛e deckertalk 17:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

W D Moore & Co Warehouse

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of its notability. The fact that there was a fire there and it sold for 15,000 pounds once says nothing about its notablity Gtwfan52 (talk) 13:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Gnangarra 23:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Gnangarra 23:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Heritage listed property Heritage Council of Western Australia. Gnangarra 23:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - apart from heritage listing it also is one of the structures in fremantle that can be associated with the time of the America's cup challenge - that is a notable use of the building SatuSuro 23:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment If the creator of the article had this information, why wasn't it put in the article? I would be happy to do it for you, but I do not know the form for Australian register sites.  And does the above voter have a reference for that fact?  Supposedly, this is part of some project, GLAM/Freopedia.  If this is the quality of work they are doing, I don't see the point.  If a business did something like this to create q-links for its products, the articles would be speedied in a flash, and someone would probably get blocked for a promo only account.  Why should this be different?  They are basically promoting tourism in a single city.  I do not see the difference. Gtwfan52 (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Included on the Register of the National Estate and the Heritage Council of Western Australia register.--Melburnian (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Heritage listed building. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Withdraw This action was poorly considered on a day when I shouldn't have touched my keyboard. Trout me to your hearts content, and my apologies to all. Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.