Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wa Ji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Wa Ji
This entry fails WP:NEO and also WP:WINAD. A failed prod. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: neologism, completely unencyclopedic. --Merovingian - Talk 12:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The article doesn't even tell readers what Wa Ji is. It tells readers to "scroll down your mouse to find out", but never actually says.  (How does one scroll down a mouse, exactly, anyway?  My experience of mice is that they probably wouldn't like it.) This is very close to being a candidate for speedy deletion for having no context.  Even ignoring that, there's strong evidence of original research here.  At first, Wa Ji was "a kind of phrase", but in response to the article being nominated for deletion it suddenly changed to not being a word or phrase at all.  Since what the article is even about changes wildly in response to Wikipedia editors, this article doesn't appear to be based upon any actual sources, but seems to be being made up on the fly directly in Wikipedia.  Delete. Uncle G 14:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It has just morphed yet again, apparently in response to what I wrote. Now it is a trick played by teenagers. Uncle G 16:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose to Delete:I don't think so. The first article and the second article is related. If you see the last post, you will know that Wa Ji is a kind of body language. In contrast, this body language can be explained verbally. I don't think there is any problem on it. Moreover, the post is updated regularly and improvements can be seen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanmung2 (talk • contribs) 2006-09-20 16:06:37
 * The article appears, at the time that I write this, to be about people hitting other people on the shoulder. The problem is that it appears that you are just making this up from whole cloth.  Please cite sources to demonstrate that that is not the case. Uncle G 16:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. hateless 16:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose to Keep - Speedy delete per hateless. Danny Lilithborne 19:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NFT, WP:WINAD, WP:OR, Not a how-to, what else?  ColourBurst 19:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete highly confusing article that doesn't really even explain exactly what Wa Ji is supposed to be. The closest it comes is "Wa Ji is a way to present your feeling. Or it is described a style of teens."  Ohh, I see.  Probably a WP:NFT case. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT and WP:V. no definition, no context, no relevant Ghits. Poorly written unencyclopaedic to boot. Ohconfucius 03:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.