Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wa Lolita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  19:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Wa Lolita

 * — (View AfD)

This is simply a subsection of Lolita fashion, to which it adds nothing. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 19:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neologistic, unreferenced. Google gives no indication that this is a common term. Guy (Help!) 19:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Jojjn 22:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Tokek 13:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice to recreation. Despite the fact that I know a great number of people who are interested in this, and I know it exists, I simply cannot find sufficient sources (one is not multiple) that vouch for notability. If more happen to pop up, I will gladly change my mind. It may be a good idea to recreate this as a redirect to Lolita fashion if this is deleted. --Core desat  09:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I had been doubtful of the sheer existence of this term in the discussion for Qi lolita, and while I still maintain no such thing as "Qi lolita" or anything related exists in Japanese, I did find "和ロリ" or Wa-rori (Wa-loli) in the ja.wiki Lolita fashion article under the heading "Related fashion". Now, this is, per said article, a related fashion statement, so not necessarily to be considered part of the Lolita genre even with the name that would suggest so. Further on, even if it is included in the ja.wiki article, this doesn't necessarily mean it's not an unnotable neologism. Searching in google with the term 和ロリ gives about 15000 hits on text and about 100 picture hits. Not notable enough, IMO. The text belongs in the Lolita fashion article. TomorrowTime 12:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.