Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waaree Energies Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Waaree Energies Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article by a clear advertising-only account and it shows since it's literally not changed since then, and the fact these links were so boldly piled here shows no one actually cared to show an actual article, simply any attempts at PR; the sources themselves, regardless, are still published and republished advertising and it shows since it's the same consistency of emphasized company specifics and business information, which means only the company itself would've been involved. Next, searches easily ad unsurprisingly found nothing else but this exactly, showing the company is damn good at inflating itself with PR and republishing it, hence WP:NOT applies since none of this is anything else but an obvious business listing. When an article is this overblown, it shows no improvements would help as the advertising foundation would still exist. A damning fact of obvious company involvements is the sheer fact this begins with the company's own "About Us" link! SwisterTwister  talk  02:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just commercial advertising. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete: The best of the references in the article is the August 2013 Economic Times item, which carries a byline, but it hardly rises above reporting a routine announcement. My searches are finding further routine announcements, which confirm this is a firm going about its business, but nothing to establish encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete-Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Light ❯❯❯ Saber 15:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.