Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wact

Article Wact listed on WP:VFD July 5 to July 12 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Much like an ad; software is hardly notable. Poccil ([[User Talk:Poccil|Talk)]] 14:41, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Ad, no claims to notability made by the article. Geogre 17:43, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Discussion was moved here by Graham &#9786; | Talk, was originally listed under June 30th.
 * It gets a decent number of google hits, but this is not an article. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 04:54, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Ad. Delete. Pyrop 04:55, Jul 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - advert - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:18, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete please. Why shouldn't these ads be speedy deleted :-( JFW | T@lk  00:34, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * The concept of the Web Application Component Toolkit could be more than just a software/ad - as it is basically an open source language framework, that has evolved from a pure wiki form to become actual usable code. (see opp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_.NET)
 * Keep - Its not an advert and it is no better than most stubs on official PHP libraries. See: PHP_programming_language. Lets clean it up and add a subsection to the PHP libraries for unofficial libraries. --Buster 08:21, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Those supposed "PHP library stubs" are links to real articles describing the subject of the library, and not the library itself. Additionally, even if they were poor stubs on the libraries, the existence of one poor stub is not justification for keeping another. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:21, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - http://wact.sourceforge.net/index.php/TemplateView represents a significant theoretical contribution to the art/science of html embedded template programming.
 * Delete. Advert. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:28, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)