Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadhurst Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination's unsupported claim has been refuted and so it already seems apparent that there is no consensus to delete. See WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉(talk) 14:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Wadhurst Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG  Jen yir e2  18:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The house (called "The New House") and its environs were Grade I-listed last year (almost unheard of for a building under 30 years old). This status is given as "buildings of exceptional interest", sometimes considered to be of greater than national importance.  (Also note the extensive source list at the bottom of the listing entry.)  The estate as a whole is also covered in an unusually lengthy entry in the latest edition of the Buildings of England series (The Buildings of England – Sussex: East with Brighton and Hove (ISBN 978-0-300-18473-0)).  If I can't get a chance to expand the article within a week, put it to Draftspace or my userspace to give me a chance to work on it later.  Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!)  21:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a significant landed estate with a long history. The article can be expanded and more sources added. (Disclaimer: I created the article.) cagliost (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems the house itself passes the GNG given the Grade 1 Listed Building entry and the "Buildings of England" entry. It seems sensible to me to keep the article about the wider estate given the reference in the Jane Brown book on Lutyens.


 * Keep has sourced and as noted the house is Grade 1 listed.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 10:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NGEO; national heritage site designations almost always mean that good sources are available, since such listings require demonstrable historical significance. Per the source list in the historicengland listing alone, those do indeed exist. --Blablubbs | talk 13:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.