Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadie Jwaideh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear. bd2412 T 01:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Wadie Jwaideh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not much coverage found. Can't be notable for being a professor. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm  (talk)  16:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * while thes appears to be a good faith Nomination by a Nom unfamiliar with middle eastern studies, it would be a good idea for editors to click through to the second and third pages of a gBooks search in the searchbar above; you don't have to click through to the actual books, just scan the snippets to a very clear idea of how influential Jwaideh's work has been.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Rename to The Kurdish National Movement (book). It seems he is mostly relevant for this book, and not much else. The book itself is highly notable, and doesn't have an entry.Icewhiz (talk) 08:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep author of 2 widely cited and reviewed scholarly books, plus a festschrift. oh, and, WP:HEY, I added s few scholarly book reviews to the page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note to closing editor. If you are tempted for any reason to close as delete - which seems highly improbable, if you were willing to give me a courtesy ping instead and a few days I would make time to come back and do an expand, source. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as WP:AUTHOR and per recent article improvements. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Perhaps only a small output, but apparently a very significant one. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.