Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadugegoda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Wadugegoda

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A town should be notable, but I couldn't find the reliable sources to show it meets WP:GNG or WP:NPLACE. Boleyn (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GEOLAND. Dan arndt (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons above. Also it is noteworthy that the town is not documented on OpenStreetMap and even if it does shown to actually be a real entity, it is most likely not a standalone settlement. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW and User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you can PER rationale to SNOW? Unless you are arguing for&mdash;and have the policy to back up&mdash;a CSD. AfDs are entitled to their 7 days. And you aren't citing any community census, policy, or guidelines but your own rationale? Remember that AfD's are closed based on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments (at WP:NOTEARLY). microbiology Marcus (petri dish·growths) 19:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. How about there are virtually no citations? How about a total lack of newspaper articles about it, or scholarly articles about it, or a single line in one primary source? A single gazette book line does not constitute significant coverage, which is theoretically required for every article or stub in Wikipedia. SNOW can be invoked whenever there is no hope for a nominated article, no "keep' !votes, and a good-faith search finds no relevant sources. In 2024, everyone knows we are not a free web host of all the information in the universe. So, yes, I am arguing this is a candidate for speedy deletion. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.