Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wafwot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was consensus to redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 11:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Wafwot
Neologism, not widespread Punkmorten 16:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be a legitimate if not widespread term (643 Google hits). I added it to List of Internet slang, which is where it belongs. &bull;DanMS 21:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 07:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Article relisted for too few votes. Johnleemk | Talk 09:38, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename to WAFWOT and redirect to the slang list it's merged in. - Mgm|(talk) 11:10, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename and Redirect. What Mgm said. Plus, contains NPOV material. rodii 13:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * That's good, we need more NPOV (neutral) material. Are you sure you didn't mean POV (biased) material? - Mgm|(talk) 09:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, duh. *blushes* Ahem. "Contains POV material." rodii 22:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.