Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wageless Economy Robotic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 02:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Wageless Economy Robotic

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Pure original research. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I disagree somewhat with the nominator - I'd call it pure drivel. No reliable references given and I couldn't find any. I think this is either a bit of fringe economic philosophy or possibly a hoax. Against the hoax are the ghits from unreliable sources seeming to be part of a publicity campaign. Whichever it is, it doesn't belong here. Peridon (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - All of the references in the article reference the side information, not the information about the topic. Seems to all be coming from this website. No other verifiable sources that I see -- many of the Google results are coming up because of comments people from that website have made on legitimate articles (for example: ). Doesn't seem to be a hoax, per se, but definitely not notable. — GorillaWarfare talk-review me! 18:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Peridon: it looks like a random text generator output... Aren't there sites that turn out pseudo-academic gibberish? We have already examined the Sokal affair, thank you, no need to replicate "pure drivel" and bring in poor old Karl to prove nonexistent points. East of Borschov 20:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: This intervention by the page creator is leading me to believe that the sole purpose of the article is to promote a book and a website. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Has anyone found any proof of the existence of "Sir Eric Sean Tite-Webber"? (Or even "Sir Eric Tite-Webber" or "Sir Eric Tite" or "Sir Sean Tite"?) Apart from two ghits connected with this subject, I can find nothing. There are a few ghits without the knighthood or baronetcy title 'Sir', but nothing of any import. Peridon (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pure original synthesis and speculation. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.