Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wagner Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 04:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Wagner Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a nicely formatted and written article about a perfectly average, non-notable company. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. Remember: we are not Yellow Pages. Companies we write about should be encyclopedic (check linked policies). This one doesn't seem to be meet said criteria. Oh, and there is also the WP:COI issue: creator is a WP:SPA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete-Searches produced no reliable secondary sources that could support notability per Wikipedia guidelines. ABF99 (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The depth of coverage in the sources is not substantial enough to establish notability for an encyclopedia, see WP:CORPDEPTH. Also per WP:NOTYELLOW. — Ben Ben (talk) 17:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above editors. Search engines did not show how this corp meets notability guidelines. Onel 5969  TT me 14:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.