Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waheed Majrooh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Waheed Majrooh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, no RS coverage, obviously promotional. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:57, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No controversy here, a very obvious promo piece. The "references" do not establish notability and hardly mention the subject. Nothing of substance on google either.  Tigerboy1966   08:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment There is an LA Times reference that seems to talk about him. Don't know if this establishes his WP:GNG however. --Artene50 (talk) 02:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It's about the subject's grandfather and doesn't mention the subject at all. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 02:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong delete quite promotional - I'm surprised it hasn't been deleted yet. non notable, promotional and spammy.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.