Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waj (language)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Waj (language)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability criteria; simply one individual's personal constructed language, of which there are thousands that have enough documentation to create articles like this. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 17:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I removed the original prod template as a curtesy because he main author of the article had attached a hangon tag for speedy deletion. Didn't look much at the article at the time, but having looked over it now I agree with Metaknowledge.  An a priori language only spoken by one person fails WP:GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. The archetype of something made up one day, without any coverage in reliable sourcing. Frankly, does this qualify for A11? Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.